How do conclusions stated in the Sciences article compare to how conclusions are stated in the Humanities article?

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍he instructions to the article analysis essay are below. Please follow the instructions directly. One source that you use in the essay will be an article from the link you have chosen in the instructions. The other reference will be research across the disciplines an introduction by Kristen Hart PhD. This is the second edition textbook figure if you cannot access this textbook please let me know. ARTICLE ANALYSIS 2: HUMANITIES Remember: This essay needs to be written in formal academic style using APA, MLA, or Turabian guidelines. Do not simply create a list of answers; you need to craft a strong, argumentative essay with an introduction, a conclusion, clear topic sentences, developed paragraphs, transitions, clear organization, and a working thesis statement (among other expectations of academic style) to control the entire piece. The essay must contain 1000-1250 words. When you cite from our textbook and your selected source(s), you must cite according to current APA, MLA, or Turabian guidelines. Choose one article, read, and answer the following questions: Article Analysis: Humanities Choices 1. Article: Genetic Rhetorical Criticism: An Alternative Methodology for Studying Multi-Versioned Rhetorical Works 2. Lasting Impact of Study Abroad Experiences: A Collaborative Autoethnography 3. Assessing the Job Quality of <>: A Case of Extreme Work 4. What is There between Minn‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍eapolis and St. Andrews?: A Third Way in the Piper-Wright Debate Research Purpose and Overview 1. What was the purpose of the article? 2. What is the thesis of the article? 3. What theory(ies) informed the research? Methods and Research 4. Identify the research method (qualitative or quantitative) used in this study. 5. Identify the specific research design discussed by Hark (2019) that your chosen article employed. Conclusions, Limitations, and Future Research 6. What is/are the conclusion(s) of the article? 7. Were limitations to the argument identified? If so, explain them. 8. Do the author(s) make suggestions for future research? If so, identify. Original Summary 9. In 150 – 200 words write an original summary (., an abstract) of the article. Original Analysis 10. Name and support three ways the Humanities article differs from the Sciences article. 11. How do conclusions stated in the Sciences article compare to how conclusions are stated in the Humanities article? Why did the authors take that approach? Reminder: Do NOT create a simple list of answers; balance your answers by creating paragraphs that address similar areas as you work through these answers. Again: a bullet list of answers is not acceptable. Be sure to write this in formal, academic prose, and be sure to support your answers by using source material—through correct formatting—from your article(s) and te‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍xtbook.