Discuss briefly the connection between the value of truth of the hypothesis (or premises) and the conclusion for each type of argument.
Construct one deductive and one inductive argument using the correct argument indicator words as we have discussed in Chapter 5.
1. In your own words, explain why your examples are inductive and deductive, respectively (HINT: a good way to do this is by discussing each of the characteristics of these types of arguments listed in Chapter 5 of your textbook)
2. Discuss briefly the connection between the value of truth of the hypothesis (or premises) and the conclusion for each type of argument.
Comments from Customer
Analytical soft skills include inductive reasoning. Soft skills, as opposed to hard skills, which are job-specific and generally require technical training, are concerned with how you interact with people, social situations, and ideas. Employers require people who can recognize patterns and use inductive reasoning to create strategies, policies, or proposals based on those patterns. As a result, inductive reasoning is a valuable skill to emphasize in job applications and interviews. Some people believe that deductive reasoning is an important life skill. It enables you to combine information from two or more statements to reach a logical conclusion. Deductive reasoning progresses from broad generalizations to specific conclusions. The most important requirement is that the statements on which the conclusion is based be true. If they are correct, the conclusion must be sound and accurate. Overall the primary distinction between inductive and deductive reasoning is that inductive reasoning seeks to develop a theory, whereas deductive reasoning seeks to test an existing theory.
Betts, J. (n.d.). Deductive reasoning examples. Examples. Retrieved February 11, 2022, from https://examples.yourdictionary.com/deductive-reasoning-examples.html
Discipline: Critical Thinker/ Weekly Discussion