discuss the means by which the literature supports or does not support particular pedagogies.

First Draft // Via googledocs February 15 // 3-4 pages
Final draft is February 22 in class, typed up
Final Length: 6.5- pgs / Times New Roman sz 12 MLA double space
PRE pedagogy research paper / two scholars
Research must be recent! 2000 + (1990 being earliest date)
Research Paper #1
One Scholar from Class:
Wendy Bishop – expressivist
James Murphy / Horner – History of Writing Instruction *
Vershawn Ashanti Young – Constructivist
Stanley Fish – Current Traditionalist
Michael J. Clark – Alternative ? NOW WHAT? Article // anti CTP
One scholar directly associated with the other scholar:
Anna Leahy- WB
Trent Hergenader – World building and digital media
Doug Hesse – CTP / Expressivist
Jason Palmeri – Remixing Composition // digital / virtual / creative pedagogy
Stephanie Vanderslice –
bell hooks – codemeshing / construcv
Audre Lorde construcv
John Cage – expressivist
Derek Owens – no reading in the writing classroom!
W.EB. Dubois – double consciousness
John McWhorter – LINGUIST txting is a language
Your goal is to focus on one particular pedagogy/pedagogical theory/pedagogical history.
WHAT ARE YOU DOING:
You might explore the benefits of a pedagogy, alternatives to a pedagogy, one scholar’s (or two scholars’ contribution to the pedagogy.
You might examine curriculums from specific states in connection to pedagogies.
You might review the pedagogies most dominant in your education and analyze the learning styles experienced and seek to develop growth.
You might examine a particular syllabus from a current or past course and discuss the means by which the literature supports or does not support particular pedagogies.
PICK ONE* // DEVELOP YOUR OWN IDEA JUST TALK TO ME ABOUT IT FIRST