How do you view the Scholar-Practitioner-Leader (SPL) in reference to the above statement?
Learning Goal: I’m working on a business discussion question and need guidance to help me learn.PaRT 1 Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following: The authors claim that the lack of organizational theory “is the growing chasm between management research and management practice” (p 27). Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following: How do you view the Scholar-Practitioner-Leader (SPL) in reference to the above statement? Could it bridge the gap between research and practice? Why or why not? Provide rationale for your answer.
Include your own experience as well as 2 citations that align with or contradict your comments as sourced from peer-reviewed academic journals, industry publicationsPART 2 REPLY IN 150 WORDS Many of the contributors are from practitioner-oriented doctoral programs such as ours (Bartunek, 2007). New theories can be developed by allowing both scholars and practitioners to contribute content. Researchers have benefited from borrowing from other fields such as psychology, this type of benefit can also be gained from closer work with practitioners who are on the ground getting first and experience (Suddaby et al., 2011). To the class – How should research projects be approached to ensure they have an SPL lens? PART 3 REPLY IN 150 WORDS My question is, how do we, as a nation maintain a governmental organizational structure that does not implode by competing social agendas, rather changes in a way to continue to support the overall national wellbeing?