summarize each differentiated activity and identify the correlation to the developmental domains.

Take a moment to review the details of this assignment below and gather any necessary files. Once you’re ready to submit your assignment, move on to Step 2.
Assessment Descriiption
Design 3-5 differentiated activities to be included in the Wellness Lesson Plan. Activities should be incorporated using the four major developmental domains (i.e., physical, social, emotional, and cognitive).
In 500-750 words, summarize each differentiated activity and identify the correlation to the developmental domains. In addition, include a rationalization for each activity identifying why the activity is appropriate for the students within the “Class Profile.”
Support your summary with a minimum of 2-3 scholarly resources
Submit the lesson plan and the summary as one deliverable.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric:
Differentiated Activities [CEC 1.2; NAEYC 1b; InTASC 1(d)]
5. 5: Target
40 points
Differentiated activities are in clear alignment with the Wellness Lesson Plan and creatively incorporate the use of the developmental domains while efficiently meeting the needs of Class Profile students.
4. 4: Acceptable
34 points
Differentiated activities are adequately in alignment with the Wellness Lesson Plan and soundly incorporate the use of the developmental domains while proficiently meeting the needs of Class Profile students.
3. 3: Approaching
30 points
Differentiated activities are in alignment with the Wellness Lesson Plan and incorporate the use of the developmental domains while meeting the needs of Class Profile students.
2. 2: Insufficient
26 points
Differentiated activities are weakly aligned to the Wellness Lesson Plan, vaguely incorporating the use of the developmental domains and in meeting the needs of Class Profile students.
1. 1: No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
collapse Rationale [CEC K1.8, K1.9; NAEYC 1b; InTASC 1(e)] assessment
Rationale [CEC K1.8, K1.9; NAEYC 1b; InTASC 1(e)]
24 points
Criteria Descriiption
Rationale [CEC K1.8, K1.9; NAEYC 1b; InTASC 1(e)]
5. 5: Target
24 points
Rationale for differentiated activities provides a compelling justification of how instructional decisions directly and superbly support the development and learning of Class Profile students.
4. 4: Acceptable
20.4 points
Rationale for differentiated activities provides a sound reasoning of how instructional decisions directly and fittingly support the development and learning of Class Profile students.
3. 3: Approaching
18 points
Rationale for differentiated activities provides a basic, functional validation of how instructional decisions directly support the development and learning of Class Profile students.
2. 2: Insufficient
15.6 points
Rationale for differentiated activities inadequately supports how instructional decisions directly support the development and learning of Class Profile students.
1. 1: No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
collapse Paragraph Development and Transitions assessment
Paragraph Development and Transitions
4 points
Criteria Descriiption
Paragraph Development and Transitions
5. 5: Target
4 points
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
4. 4: Acceptable
3.4 points
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.
3. 3: Approaching
3 points
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
2. 2: Insufficient
2.6 points
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
1. 1: No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
collapse Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
8 points
Criteria Descriiption
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Target
8 points
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
4. 4: Acceptable
6.8 points
Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language.
3. 3: Approaching
6 points
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.
2. 2: Insufficient
5.2 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
1. 1: No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
collapse Appropriate Template assessment
Appropriate Template
4 points
Criteria Descriiption
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
5. 5: Target
4 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Acceptable
3.4 points
Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Approaching
3 points
Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. 2: Insufficient

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.