Describe the metaparadigm’s significance specific to your nursing practice.

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format.
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Question/Prompt [Due Friday]
Please read the following introduction and complete the following steps for your initial discussion post:
This discussion question focuses on the four nursing paradigms, which are comprised of person, health, environment, and nursing. Each metaparadigm plays a key role in the nursing process and is essential when providing patient care.
Select one metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, or environment).
Describe the metaparadigm’s significance specific to your nursing practice.
Compare and contrast two nursing theorists’ individual definitions/interpretations of the selected nursing metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, or environment).
Be sure to supplement your discussion with your personal and professional experiences.
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
This topic is valued at 40 points. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
(2022 Spring A18 Term) NU500-7FDiscussionsUnit 2 Discussion 2 – Nursing Metaparadigms
Home
Announcements
Syllabus
Modules
Collaborations
Chat
BigBlueButton
Grades
People
Office 365
WoltersKluwer LTI 1.3
This is a graded discussion: 40 points possible
due Jan 21
Unit 2 Discussion 2 – Nursing Metaparadigms
1010 unread replies.1010 replies.
Unit 2 Discussion [Due Friday]
Nursing Metaparadigms
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format.
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Question/Prompt [Due Friday]
Please read the following introduction and complete the following steps for your initial discussion post:
This discussion question focuses on the four nursing paradigms, which are comprised of person, health, environment, and nursing. Each metaparadigm plays a key role in the nursing process and is essential when providing patient care.
Select one metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, or environment).
Describe the metaparadigm’s significance specific to your nursing practice.
Compare and contrast two nursing theorists’ individual definitions/interpretations of the selected nursing metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, or environment).
Be sure to supplement your discussion with your personal and professional experiences.
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
This topic is valued at 40 points. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt [Due Sunday]
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least three of these prompts:
Compare your selected metaparadigm with your peers’ selections in terms of its relevance and significance
Contrast the significance of the metaparadigms to your practice with that presented by your peers.
Share any additional thoughts about the four metaparadigms.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Estimated time to complete: 1 hour
Search entries or author
Search entries or author
Filter replies by unread
ReplyReply to Unit 2 Discussion 2 – Nursing Metaparadigms
Replies are only visible to those who have posted at least one reply.
Assignment Rubric Details
close
Rubric
NU500 Unit 2 Discussion 2 – Nursing Metaparadigms Rubric
NU500 Unit 2 Discussion 2 – Nursing Metaparadigms Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
NU500-CO1; NU500-CO2; NU500-CO3; NU500-CO4; NU500-CO5; NU500-CO6; PRICE-I
12 pts
100%
Initial post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion and demonstrates an exemplary understanding of course content and topic.
11 pts
92%
Initial post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of course content and topic.
10 pts
83%
Initial post is missing one important prompt element and/or demonstrates a basic understanding of course content and topic.
9 pts
75%
Initial post is missing more than one important prompt element and/or demonstrates a limited understanding of course content and topic.
8 pts
67%
Initial post does not address discussion prompt elements, and/or does not demonstrate understanding of course content and topic and/or initial post is poorly paraphrased even if accompanied by in-text citations.
0 pts
0%
Initial post was not submitted and/or not submitted on time and/or initial post demonstrates copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
NU500-CO1; NU500-CO2; NU500-CO3; NU500-CO4; NU500-CO5; NU500-CO6; PRICE-I
12 pts
100%
The analysis of the topic includes breadth and depth, is aligned to the unit topic, relates to the course content and personal analysis is supported by exemplary references and examples.
11 pts
92%
The analysis of the topic is justified, and aligned to the unit topic, and personal analysis is supported by comprehensive references and/or examples.
10 pts
83%
There is a basic analysis of the topic and personal analysis is supported by basic references and/or examples.
9 pts
75%
There is minimal evidence of analysis of the topic and/or personal analysis is supported by limited references and/or examples.
8 pts
67%
There is no evidence of analysis of the topic and/or personal analysis is not supported by references and/or examples.
0 pts
0%
Initial post was not submitted and/or not submitted on time and/or analysis had no relationship to the topic and/or initial post demonstrates copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollaboration
PRICE-E
12 pts
100%
Collaborates with fellow learners at an exemplary level relating the discussion to relevant course concepts and extending the conversation with substantive content.
11 pts
92%
Collaborates with fellow learners at a comprehensive level relating the discussion to relevant course concepts and extending the conversation with substantive content.
10 pts
83%
Collaborates with fellow learners at a basic level relating the discussion to some course concepts and extending the conversation with basic content and/or postings are not submitted on a minimum of 3 separate days.
9 pts
75%
Limited collaboration with fellow learners and makes little connection to course content and/or does not extend the conversation.
8 pts
67%
Collaborates with fellow learners but only one response post was submitted and/or response post(s) are poorly paraphrased even if accompanied by in-text citations.
0 pts
0%
No response posts were submitted and/or not submitted on time and/or there is no relationship between the response posts and the discussion prompts and/or one or more response posts demonstrate copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
2 pts
100%
Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized demonstrating exemplary scholarly writing. Mechanics (spelling and punctuation) and grammar are excellent.
1.8 pts
92%
Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized demonstrating comprehensive scholarly writing and/or have 1-2 errors in mechanics and/or grammar.
1.7 pts
83%
Posts in this discussion are basic examples of scholarly writing and/or have 3 errors in mechanics and/or grammar.
1.5 pts
75%
Posts in this discussion are not clear and/or lack organization and/or have 4 or more errors in mechanics and/or grammar.
1.3 pts
67%
Posts in this discussion lack evidence of clear, organized scholarly writing. Errors interfere with reading and/or understanding of content.
0 pts
0%
Posts were not submitted and/or one or more posts demonstrate copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
PRICE-I
2 pts
100%
Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style and formatting.
1.8 pts
92%
Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references but have 1-2 minor APA errors.
1.7 pts
83%
Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references but have 3-4 APA errors.
1.5 pts
75%
Posts in this discussion demonstrate in-text citations of sources and references but have 5-6 APA errors.
1.3 pts
67%
Posts in this discussion do not provide sufficient in-text citations and/or references and/or have 7 or more APA errors.
0 pts
0%
Posts were not submitted and/or one or more posts demonstrate copying and pasting with or without proper use of quotations or supporting in-text citations.
2 pts
Total Points: 40

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.