comparing and contrasting their views on the nature of science
This essay needs to be 1500-2000 words, 5 or more paragraphs with a clear introduction, thesis statement and conclusion, written in APA format.
Select any two of the philosophers of science addressed in the attached and linked sources and write a paper comparing and contrasting their views on the nature of science. Apply these differing understandings to a practical scientific example. What are the strengths and limitations of each position, and which one is more compelling? The paper must include at least 2 academic sources and in-text citations.
Web sources (more are attached):